Research Designs in School Psychology

Today, you will become familiar with the different types of research designs commonly used in school psychology. We'll explore the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational, and single-subject designs, preparing you to understand and analyze research studies more effectively.

Learning Objectives

Identify the key characteristics of experimental research designs.
Differentiate between quasi-experimental and experimental designs.
Explain the purpose of correlational research and interpret correlation coefficients.
Describe the basic components of single-subject research designs.

Lesson Content

Introduction to Research Designs

School psychologists use research to understand and address the challenges faced by students and schools. Research designs are the blueprints for a study, outlining how a researcher will collect and analyze data. Different designs are used depending on the research question and what the researcher wants to learn. The goal is to provide evidence-based practices to help students and the school community. We'll cover four main types: Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, Correlational, and Single-Subject designs. Think of these like different tools in a toolbox – each is designed to solve a different kind of problem.

Experimental Designs

Experimental designs are considered the 'gold standard' for establishing cause-and-effect relationships. They involve manipulating an independent variable (the thing the researcher changes) and measuring its effect on a dependent variable (the thing being measured). Key elements include random assignment of participants to groups (control group and treatment group), and manipulation of the independent variable. The control group does not receive the intervention, and the treatment group receives it. For example, a school psychologist might want to see if a new reading intervention improves reading scores. They would randomly assign students to either receive the intervention (treatment group) or receive the standard reading instruction (control group). The reading scores would be the dependent variable.

Strengths: Strongest for determining cause-and-effect.
Weaknesses: Can be difficult or unethical to implement in real-world school settings (e.g., it may not be ethical to withhold a potentially helpful intervention from a student). May not always generalize well to all populations.

Quasi-Experimental Designs

Quasi-experimental designs are similar to experimental designs, but they do not use random assignment. Researchers often use pre-existing groups. For example, a school psychologist might compare the reading scores of students in a classroom that received a new reading program (treatment group) to those in a different classroom using the existing reading program (control group). They don't randomly assign students to classrooms; it's based on pre-existing conditions.

Strengths: More practical than experimental designs in schools; they can be used with existing groups.
Weaknesses: Difficult to rule out other factors that could be influencing the results. Cause-and-effect conclusions are less certain than with experimental designs.

Correlational Designs

Correlational designs examine the relationship between two or more variables, but do not manipulate any variables. They aim to describe how variables change together. They use a statistical measure called a correlation coefficient (a number between -1 and +1) to show the strength and direction of the relationship. A positive correlation means the variables increase or decrease together (e.g., more study time, higher grades), while a negative correlation means the variables move in opposite directions (e.g., more absences, lower grades). A correlation of 0 means there's no relationship. It's crucial to remember that correlation does not equal causation! Just because two things are related doesn't mean one causes the other.

Strengths: Useful for identifying potential relationships and generating hypotheses.
Weaknesses: Cannot determine cause-and-effect. There may be other factors influencing the observed relationship.

Single-Subject Designs

Single-subject designs involve repeated measurement of a single individual or a small group of individuals over time. They are commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention. The researcher usually establishes a baseline (a period of observation before the intervention) and then introduces the intervention, monitoring the change in behavior. The most basic single-subject design is the A-B design, where 'A' represents the baseline phase, and 'B' represents the intervention phase. Other designs involve multiple phases (e.g., A-B-A, A-B-A-B) that allow the researcher to see if the behavior changes when the intervention is introduced and withdrawn.

Strengths: Helpful for individualized interventions; directly measures the effect of an intervention on a specific individual.
Weaknesses: The results may not generalize to other individuals; can be time-consuming; requires consistent data collection.

Deep Dive

Explore advanced insights, examples, and bonus exercises to deepen understanding.

School Psychologist: Data Analysis & Research - Day 6: Extended Learning

Welcome to the extended learning portion of today's lesson! We've explored the basics of research designs. Now, let's delve deeper into the nuances of each design, apply them to real-world scenarios, and challenge ourselves with some advanced concepts.

Deep Dive: Beyond the Basics

Let's go beyond the surface understanding of research designs. Here's a deeper look:

Experimental Designs: Think of the importance of controlling for extraneous variables! Random assignment is key. But, what if random assignment isn't always feasible? Explore the limitations of internal validity (how sure you are that the intervention caused the change) and external validity (how well the findings generalize to other settings and populations). Consider factors like participant characteristics, setting, and timing of the study. Also, explore factorial designs (e.g., examining the impact of two interventions simultaneously, or the interaction of an intervention with a student's age).
Quasi-Experimental Designs: These designs often use pre-existing groups (like classrooms). Because random assignment isn't used, researchers must be extra vigilant about threats to internal validity. Consider common quasi-experimental designs like interrupted time-series, non-equivalent control group designs, and cohort designs. How do researchers attempt to address the limitations? (e.g., matching, statistical controls).
Correlational Designs: Correlation DOES NOT equal causation! This fundamental principle is critical. Consider the direction of the correlation (positive or negative) and the strength of the relationship (represented by the correlation coefficient, ranging from -1 to +1). Explore the concept of confounding variables – other factors that might explain the observed relationship. For example, increased ice cream sales (correlation) are associated with increased drowning (correlation) – but summer heat (confounding variable) is more likely the root cause.
Single-Subject Designs: These designs are powerful for evaluating interventions on an individual. Beyond the simple AB design (baseline, intervention), explore the variations such as reversal designs (ABAB), multiple baseline designs, and changing criterion designs. How does the type of baseline data collected (e.g., frequency, duration, latency) affect the interpretations of the findings? Consider visual inspection of the data and the use of statistical analysis.

Bonus Exercises

Scenario Analysis: Imagine you are asked to evaluate a new reading intervention program. Identify the *most* appropriate research design and explain *why* that design is the best fit, considering the program goals, the school setting, and the available resources. Outline the key elements of your design (e.g., participants, intervention, measures, how data would be analyzed).
Correlation Exploration: Search for a news article or research study online that reports a correlation. Briefly describe the correlation, identify the two variables involved, discuss whether the correlation is positive or negative, and explain whether you can infer a causal relationship based on the information provided. If not, what other explanations are possible?
Single-Subject Design Challenge: Design a multiple baseline design to evaluate the effectiveness of a classroom management strategy (e.g., positive reinforcement for staying on task). Identify three students who would benefit from the strategy. Describe how you would collect baseline data, implement the intervention, and analyze the data.

Real-World Connections

Understanding research designs is crucial in the daily work of a school psychologist. Here's how:

Program Evaluation: School psychologists often evaluate the effectiveness of programs (e.g., bullying prevention, social-emotional learning curricula, academic interventions). This requires a deep understanding of appropriate research designs to collect and analyze data, and to identify effective practices.
Data-Driven Decision Making: You'll be analyzing existing school data (attendance, grades, discipline referrals) to identify student needs and inform intervention strategies. Knowledge of research designs helps you interpret these data critically and draw sound conclusions.
Evidence-Based Practice: You need to be able to evaluate the quality of research articles, understand what types of evidence support an intervention, and know how to apply this information in a professional context.
Consultation and Collaboration: School psychologists often consult with teachers, parents, and administrators. You'll explain research findings in a clear and understandable way, including the limitations and the implications for practice.

Challenge Yourself

Consider a real-world problem (e.g., student anxiety, poor academic performance, disruptive behavior) in your local schools. How could you design a study using each of the four research designs (experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational, single-subject) to investigate this issue?

Further Learning

Here are some topics and resources for continued exploration:

Meta-Analysis: Learn about how researchers synthesize findings across multiple studies.
Statistical Significance vs. Practical Significance: Learn how to interpret the statistical significance, along with practical significance of results.
Explore Specific Research Methodologies: Delve into specific research methodologies, such as qualitative research and mixed methods research.
Online Resources: Explore resources such as the APA style and other guidelines.

Interactive Exercises

Design Identification

Read the following study descriptions and identify the type of research design used in each: 1. A school psychologist randomly assigns students with ADHD to either a new medication or a placebo and then measures their attention levels. 2. A researcher examines the relationship between students' attendance rates and their GPAs. 3. A school psychologist compares the reading comprehension scores of students in a special education classroom who received a new reading program with those of students who didn't receive the program. 4. A school psychologist measures a student's disruptive behavior during math class for a week, then implements a token economy, and then takes more measurements to see if the behavior changes. * *Identify the design for each study.*

Real-World Research Scenario

Imagine you're a school psychologist. A teacher asks you to help reduce student off-task behavior in her classroom. Describe how you would use each of the following research designs to address the teacher's concern. Include the specific variables (independent and dependent variables, where applicable) you'd investigate. * Experimental Design * Quasi-Experimental Design * Correlational Design * Single-Subject Design

Practical Application

Think about a specific problem you've observed in a school setting. Describe how you would design a study using each of the four research methods (experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational, single-subject) to investigate this problem. Be sure to detail the variables, participants, and procedures you would employ. This will help you see the application in a real-world setting.

Key Takeaways

Experimental designs are ideal for establishing cause-and-effect, but can be difficult to implement in schools.
Quasi-experimental designs are more practical in school settings when random assignment isn't possible.
Correlational designs explore relationships, but cannot determine cause-and-effect.
Single-subject designs are useful for evaluating individual interventions.

Next Steps

Prepare for the next lesson by thinking about specific examples of research studies you have encountered. Try to identify the research design used in each study and consider the strengths and weaknesses of that design.

Your Progress is Being Saved!

We're automatically tracking your progress. Sign up for free to keep your learning paths forever and unlock advanced features like detailed analytics and personalized recommendations.

Next Lesson (Day 7)

Regenerating Content