Secondary Sources: Legal Encyclopedias and Law Reviews

This lesson introduces you to secondary legal sources, specifically legal encyclopedias and law reviews. You'll learn how these resources differ from primary sources and how they can be invaluable tools for understanding legal concepts and efficiently locating relevant case law and statutes.

Learning Objectives

  • Define and differentiate between primary and secondary legal sources.
  • Identify the purpose and use of legal encyclopedias (Am. Jur. and C.J.S.).
  • Explain the role and value of law review articles in legal research.
  • Demonstrate the ability to locate and summarize information from legal encyclopedias and law reviews.

Text-to-Speech

Listen to the lesson content

Lesson Content

Primary vs. Secondary Legal Sources: A Quick Review

Before diving into our focus for today, let’s quickly recap. Primary sources are the law itself: constitutions, statutes (laws passed by legislatures), court cases (judicial opinions), and administrative regulations. Think of them as the rules. Secondary sources, on the other hand, explain, analyze, and comment on the law. They are not the law itself, but they help you understand it and find the primary sources that are relevant to your research. They are like the commentators and guides. Today, we are focusing on two major types of secondary sources: legal encyclopedias and law reviews.

Legal Encyclopedias: Your Roadmaps to the Law

Legal encyclopedias provide broad overviews of legal topics, organized alphabetically. They summarize the law on various subjects, citing to primary sources (statutes, cases, etc.) for support. They're great for getting a general understanding of an area of law or finding cases and statutes related to your issue. Two major encyclopedias used in the US are:

  • American Jurisprudence 2d (Am. Jur. 2d): A comprehensive national encyclopedia covering all areas of U.S. law. Think of it as a very detailed A-Z of US law.
  • Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.): Another national encyclopedia with a similar scope to Am. Jur. 2d. It is also organized alphabetically and covers a wide range of legal topics. A good practice is to compare information across both to get a comprehensive view.

Example: Imagine you're researching a case involving a breach of contract. You could look up "Contracts" in Am. Jur. 2d or C.J.S. to get a general overview of contract law and specific information about breach of contract, including the elements of a breach and relevant case law. They are excellent starting points for preliminary research and understanding. Remember though, they are NOT the law, so you must always verify the information by reviewing the cited primary sources (cases, statutes, etc.).

Law Reviews: Deep Dives into Legal Issues

Law reviews are scholarly journals published by law schools. They contain articles written by legal scholars (professors, judges, attorneys) and sometimes by law students. Law review articles provide in-depth analysis of specific legal issues, explore cutting-edge topics, critique current legal trends, and propose changes to the law. They are not always easy to read, but they can offer very deep understanding of specific law areas. They are invaluable for gaining insight into the nuances of a legal topic and finding supporting arguments and authorities.

Key Features:
* In-depth analysis: Go deeper into specific legal areas than legal encyclopedias
* Scholarly Perspective: Offer expert opinions and analysis.
* Citation of Authorities: They thoroughly cite primary and secondary sources.

Example: You might find a law review article discussing the implications of a new state law or analyzing a recent Supreme Court decision impacting your research. You can often locate law review articles using databases like Westlaw or LexisNexis, by searching keywords and the topic you are working on.

Progress
0%