**Tax Allocations & Special Allocations

This lesson delves into the intricacies of tax allocations within partnerships, focusing on special allocations and their implications. We'll explore advanced applications, including substantial economic effect, partner capital account maintenance, and the interplay between allocation methods and partnership agreements.

Learning Objectives

  • Define and differentiate between regular and special allocations in partnership taxation.
  • Analyze the 'substantial economic effect' requirements for valid special allocations.
  • Apply the rules for maintaining partner capital accounts according to Treasury Regulations.
  • Evaluate the tax consequences of different special allocation scenarios, including loss allocations.

Text-to-Speech

Listen to the lesson content

Lesson Content

Review of Basic Allocations

Partnerships generally allocate items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit to partners based on their partnership agreement. In the absence of a specific allocation method, items are allocated according to the partners' profit-sharing percentages. However, the partnership agreement can specify how these items are allocated; these are called special allocations. For example, if a partnership's agreement states 'All depreciation deductions shall be allocated 60% to Partner A and 40% to Partner B,' that is a special allocation.

Example: ABC Partnership has three equal partners (A, B, and C). In the absence of an agreement regarding a specific allocation, all income is allocated equally, one-third each. If the agreement states that a loss from the sale of land is allocated 50% to A and 50% to B, it overrides the default equal split for that specific item.

The Substantial Economic Effect Test

For special allocations to be valid, they must have 'substantial economic effect' under Section 704(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. This means that the allocation must be economically significant to the partners, and its economic impact must correspond to the tax allocation. The regulations provide a three-part test:

  1. Economic Effect: The allocation must affect the partners' capital accounts (maintained according to specific rules). Upon liquidation of the partnership, the partners must receive distributions according to their capital account balances.
  2. Economic Effect Must Be Substantial: There must be a reasonable possibility that the allocation will affect the dollar amounts to be received by the partners independent of the tax consequences. This means the economic effect of the allocation, viewed without regard to the tax consequences, must be substantial.
  3. Partner Capital Account Maintenance: Capital accounts must be maintained in accordance with the regulations, which include rules on how to account for contributions, distributions, and items of income and loss. (More in the next section).

Example: A partnership agrees to allocate all of its operating losses to Partner A. The partnership agreement provides that upon liquidation, the partners receive distributions based on their capital account balances. This is the economic effect. The allocation is substantial if the possibility exists that Partner A will receive a smaller distribution than Partner B in the event of a partnership liquidation.

Capital Account Maintenance Rules

Proper capital account maintenance is critical to the validity of special allocations. The Treasury Regulations outline specific rules, including:

  • Contributions and Distributions: Contributions (cash, property) increase a partner's capital account; distributions (cash, property) decrease it. Property contributions or distributions are valued at fair market value.
  • Book Income and Loss: Income and gain increase capital accounts, and losses and deductions decrease them. This is often referred to as "book" income and loss, which may differ from the taxable income or loss.
  • Revaluations: Capital accounts must be adjusted to reflect revaluations of partnership property, such as when the property is contributed to the partnership or when there is a change in ownership. These adjustments are based on the fair market value of the property.
  • Allocations of Nonrecourse Debt: Nonrecourse debt can generate loss or deductions that would otherwise reduce a partner's capital account below zero. Special rules must be followed related to minimum gain chargeback provisions.

Example: Partner A contributes land with a fair market value of $100,000 (basis $40,000) and Partner B contributes cash of $100,000. The capital accounts are initially $100,000 each. If the partnership sells the land for $150,000, a gain of $110,000 is recognized, and if this gain is allocated equally the capital accounts would be increased by $55,000. The capital accounts would then be: A: $155,000; B: $155,000.

Special Allocation Scenarios and Planning

Common special allocation scenarios include:

  • Loss Allocations: These often require careful planning to ensure that the allocation has substantial economic effect and avoids creating negative capital accounts for partners. The agreement must provide for a deficit restoration obligation or qualified income offset.
  • Depreciation Allocations: Often used to allocate a larger share of depreciation deductions to partners with a higher capital contribution. These allocations are subject to the same rules of substantial economic effect.
  • Allocation of Credits: Special allocations of tax credits, like the low-income housing credit, are common and must be carefully structured to comply with IRS requirements.

Planning Considerations:
* Always consult the partnership agreement carefully.
* Model the economic effects of the allocation under various scenarios (e.g., gain, loss, liquidation).
* Consider the impact on partner basis in the partnership interest.
* Seek professional advice from a tax advisor to ensure compliance.

Example: A partnership allocates 90% of the partnership's depreciation deductions to one partner who had contributed the majority of the capital. This special allocation could have substantial economic effect if the partnership agreement includes a deficit restoration obligation for that partner or a qualified income offset.

Progress
0%